Because literary studies are concerned with the analysis of literature, it has expanded to embrace other types of writing in addition to fiction. Although the basic texts of literary studies have remained conventional, i.e. ‘fictional’ works, the methodologies, and tactics utilized in literary studies are now being used to non-fictional texts such as biography and journalistic writing.
Another point to add to literature’s recent rebuttal to skeptics is that, because all writing must adhere to a recognizable form of expression, the question remains as to how genuine the truth content of so-called non-fictional texts is when it is regulated by pre-existing standards of expression.
This conversation is an excellent illustration of modern literary theory’s rich territory, particularly the link between language and experience. Instead of focusing on contemporary themes such as how a discourse like literary theory arose from the muddle of other disciplines, perhaps a historical look at literary studies could be restored; not in a sentimental sense, but as a means of determining the future relevance of literature.
The study of literature entails a study of communication channels. The writings being discussed and analyzed are literary texts. It can encompass works that add to the body of human knowledge as well as writings of stylistic excellence. The goal is to apply this approach of investigation to other sectors. I’ve just detailed a literary studies viewpoint that appears new but is actually rather ancient.
The study of literature as we know it now did not exist. It is a fairly contemporary field in certain aspects, yet it may also be considered one of the oldest disciplines. We may see that there is a formal technique to those old works if we consider the oral legacy of the ancient world when poets learned the procedures of narrating ‘stories.’ These poets’ skills were ‘formalized’ in the shape of rhythms and refrains, which were learned and then performed.
Literary strategies may be shown in the fact that the earliest poets were aware of devices and procedures. A contemporary may still establish the connection between the study of literature and the act of performing in all of its forms. Indeed, a craftsman must grasp the tools of the trade in order to appreciate and preserve a heritage, which academics have credited to Homer in the case of ancient Greece, but in today’s world, literature has lost its affinity for producing aesthetic goods. It is not always the case that studying literature leads to the creation of great literature (whatever that may be).
In the ancient world, literature was intricately linked to social life. Poetry, for example, was known to be a part of religious rituals, ceremonies, and communal history. In other words, poetry, which was the main form of literature in the ancient world, had a social role by communicating various parts of the society’s culture and history to the community. But, in this day and age, when we can study history in books and learn about the world around us through the media, what use does it serve? The solution to this issue is found in how we should receive and examine written materials. I’ll use the academic tradition of literature to explain this.
The study of literature was enmeshed in a related subject known as rhetoric, which encompassed a wide variety of issues that would be appalling to modern ears. Philosophy, language, history, and literary writing are among them. Although it has a scornful reputation in the modern world for being ‘hollow’ and seductive rather than honest, it was recognized as a discipline that included a wide variety of concerns in the ancient and medieval worlds.
The study of language, similar to our current literary studies, is central to rhetoric. Moving forward to the Renaissance era, rhetorical studies grew to include the study of ancient writers’ styles and forms, covering concepts from Plato through Aristotle in their original Greek.
The Renaissance is a significant period in Western history, and humanism is the method used at that time. In the 14th and 15th centuries, colleges in Europe had what was known as studia humanitatis, or the study of grammar, poetry, moral philosophy, and history. Professional rhetoricians, interestingly, believed these things to be within the scope of rhetoric. The value of mastering style was recognized by rhetoricians who specialized in the study of language, whether for use in political speeches or philosophy. The rhetoricians perceived the capacity and potential of knowledge in language, and this is a crucial point.
To put it another way, knowledge and language are intricately linked. The world takes on the characteristics of the words we use to describe it. This may appear to be highly postmodern, yet its origins may be traced back to an older tradition. Though they thought they were discovering something new, they were actually uncovering newer kinds of writing.
The important element to remember is that literary studies are enmeshed in fields that one would not connect with it. Rhetoric was not the study of elaborate speech, which was a charge leveled against literature. Instead, it covers a wide range of topics. Of course, rhetoric and literature are not the same, but the parallels are obvious.
The examination of language is the common denominator in both areas. This does not include cataloging different styles of writing; rather, it entails creating ideas from them. The influence of such an endeavor may be observed in the Western world’s Renaissance period. Language and the realm of ideas are not mutually exclusive, but they are intertwined. When we talk about ideas, we’re talking about everything from politics to psychology. Stoics, for example, deduced logic from the language in the ancient world. As a result, language is the foundation of knowledge, and its study is critical for the growth of thought in various disciplines of knowledge.
After then, philology emerged as a distinct field of rhetoric. This section is concerned with the study of language usage and the origins of the meanings of words. It is the study of texts from politics, philosophy, scientific treatises, and other fields, as well as rhetoric. Friedrich Nietzsche, possibly the most prominent philosopher of the twentieth century and a qualified philologist, was one of the results of the diverse selection of books included in the study of philology. This demonstrates the link between language analysis and concept analysis. I’m not claiming that literature is philosophy or politics; rather, I believe that literature influences other subjects.
The analysis of language is now studied, applied, and investigated in the study of English Literature. This is a topic that is being discussed in modern philosophy and theoretical viewpoints. The study of human experiences, as well as the intellectual concepts of a period, civilization, and culture, is what literature is all about. It is clearly clear that literature is inherited from earlier academic disciplines such as rhetoric and philology, both of which have traditions that are incorporated into Literature.
Understanding a literary perspective, which encompasses the analysis of language itself, is equally critical for individuals studying other fields. When we contrast this with the common modern perception of literature as a noble and graceful way to pass the time, we see a disconnect between what the profession has to offer and how it is seen. For those who are still perplexed by the relevance of literature, it is best understood as a meta-discipline whose application in other subjects is essential to the advancement of human intellect and growth, in my opinion.
Take away: Importance of literature
If we sum up the points made in this little essay, we can conclude that literature encompasses all forms of writing and is studied with the aim of assessing stylistic advances and building a body of information from texts. The way of reading the text is a third coordinate that I have neglected to mention. A reader makes a text literary, not the other way around.
1. To learn about history from time immemorial and the timeline of events.
2. To improve our humanity and compassion and love for others.
3. To open our brains to ambiguities of meaning
4. To learn to observe life from a micro and macro levels.
5. To instill in us the ability to recognize individual bias.
6. To see a tragedy.
7. To learn to empathize with others who are different from ourselves.
8. To gain a better understanding of why people are the way they are.
9. To keep our minds active
10. To benefit from other people’s knowledge.
11. To understand the difference between bad and good, true or life.
12. To improve our judgment.
13. To examine various cultures and beliefs.
14. To learn to back up our arguments and accept our own interpretations.
15. To improve our language skills.
16. To inspire us to challenge “established” information.
17. To investigate ethical dilemmas.
18. To recognize the historical significance of literature.
19. To identify and appreciate the emotional power of language devices.
20. Recognize excellence in daily life.
21. To learn better ways to act.
22. To assist us in seeing ourselves through the eyes of others.
23. To realize we aren’t alone.
24. To be creative and innovative.
25. To solve problems and challenges.
The study of literature is more than just a collection of devices and facts; it changes our perceptions of the world. Literary approaches provide a new and innovative perspective on the world that is both imaginative and disciplined. Those who start on this adventure will find this peculiar union of the rational and irrational to be daunting. Furthermore, what greater weapon can we use to confront the facts of this world than a paradoxical attitude?
More Interesting Articles